Below is a photograph of my attempt for depicting textures using a variety of materials such as charcoal, Indian Ink (neat and diluted) and a flat paintbrush and a graphite HB pencil. The four materials I chose were bubblewrap, a ceramic geometric vase, a ball of garden twine and glass empty jam jar. These textures were chosen due to their variety in texture and material composition; smooth, rough, flat, bumpy, sharp and soft edges, solid/malleable all provide a playground for this exercise.

Starting with the bubble wrap; this was my first attempt at drawing an object in a free and expressive way, using the materials to create a sense of texture, rather than only depicting what I would normally try, a 3d realistic drawing with accurate lines and shading. I am quite excited by the outcome and have surprised myself that a new technique has been acknowledged and can developed further, possibly producing visually and physically stimulating pieces of work. I would like to try painting the ink onto the bubblewrap and pressing this onto paper, wet and/or dry to see what outcome this would produce. What about different coloured inks? How would this look? I feel this piece looks almost like frogspawn; an interesting idea for a natural water-themed piece maybe?
The geometric ceramic vase; I actually thought this piece would be difficult to depict due to the intricacy of the sharp, angular geometric design. Because of this, I chose to not study the design too realistically and tried to focus on the light and shade elements of the piece. The light was coming from the left hand side and created beautiful triangular shadows on the right hand side of each diamond shape. I used charcoal only for this piece as I wanted to try different tonal shading with it, from harsh dark lines to a lighter shade representing the light reflecting. I used my fingers to smudge the charcoal to obtain this variety of shading and found it easy to see where the obvious differences of light and shade fell on the vase itself when I squinted at it so the form fell out of focus but and left the tonal shading as the most obvious aspect within my vision. Although I do feel this piece could be developed further by making it slightly bigger or using a thinner piece of charcoal as I would have liked to really distinguish the diamond shapes within the vase and use my fingers (or possibly a cotton bud if keeping the drawing smaller) to smudge the charcoal within the diamond areas to get a greater variety of tones, as this is evident when I look at the vase in the light, each of the four faces of each diamond shape on the vase carries a different tone because of the way the light falls upon it. There is almost a slight pineapple appearance tho this piece!
Ball of twine; rough, layered, stringy, wirey, solid. A few words that I held in my head while trying to depict this texture object. To feel in my hands, the ball of twine felt rough, heavy and solid, but to look at, it is but solid but delicate and intricate. This was a real challenge for me to think about how to represent this because it made me think about which media to use and how. I selected a mixed media approach because I felt I needed more than one material to describe the depth to the ball (the charcoal gave great depth with its ability for graduated tonal shading) and the intricacy of the layered twine (the Indian Ink gave me this by being able to accurately draw lines on top of the tonal base but also provide a scratchy feel with the chopstick to represent the wirey twine). By this drawing, I felt freer and less restricted with my materials and learnt, from Exercise 1 – the Joy emotion quadrant drawings – with Indian Ink, the techniques and methods I could deploy to achieve what I set out to with the ball of twine; fast but descriptive and the ability to add thicker lines by applying more surface area of the chopstick and ink. I wanted to take this piece further to explore as I felt inspired to see if I could develop my technique to add texture and tone further.
Below are two examples of this further self-led exploration; the first photo demonstrated my keenness to add more depth with shading and tones from the charcoal I previously used in the initial drawing, which after reflection, I think I added too much and this created a smooth barrier so when I applied the ink, the roughness of the brown paper couldn’t be reached by the ink and chopstick to create the wirey and scratchy effect, it just sat on the surface of the charcoal barrier. I chose this paper specifically because I wanted the texture of it to react with the chopstick, ink and charcoal to add a scratchy effect, representing the texture of the twine itself.

Ball of twine, charcoal and Indian ink, overworked and not happy with this
This is when I chose to try again with the third piece (second photo below). I’m happier with the colour and texture of the brown paper coming through, also the fewer ink lines portraying the twine seem to work better with the lighter shading of charcoal behind. I would like to see how this piece could be developed by dipping the twine in the Indian ink, possibly a range of dilutions, and laying or pulling this across the paper on top of the charcoal to see how this would look/feel.

The final piece is a depiction of a glass jar with raised decoration on the side. I feel this piece challenged me the most because of the aim to represent the solidity or the jar simultaneously with the delicacy of the raised glass detail but also the transparency of the material itself; how am I going to depict the texture whilst retaining some reference to its transparency? I did spend some time reflecting on this before going ahead with the drawing. After some time, I felt ready to progress with my chosen medium of Indian again but this time diluted to create a semi-transparent feel to it, which held a lightness but still defined an area of space. I then used a stronger application to dab on a representation of the raised glass detail that adorns the side of the jar. I didn’t really know how else to depict this; I suspect this could be a further avenue to explore and develop next. (See below for further research)
This experiment has taught me to relax and enjoy the free-flowing properties of the materials, be ‘in the moment’ and be conscious of the possible outcomes when using them, if they behave the way I expected, use it as a learning outcome and try another way to develop this technique further. I’ve also understood that the properties of the materials may seem exhaustive, but the outcome of using the materials either exclusively or in partnership with others, can produce endless possibilities when creating drawings, producing effects for texture as well as tone, shape and shading etc. Ive also understood that a practitioner can add depth and excitement for the senses when using this method of free-flow and representative expression and these techniques can also be learnt and developed further to be incorporated into the composition of a larger piece of artwork.

The ‘Frottage’ element of this exercise was good fun; being an investigator to find various objects to capture in this form was quite enjoyable. There were a few pieces above which surprised me; the music stand (back rest), the stencil and the metal napkin holder were examples of Frottage over an object with holes or recesses that when shaded over, the pencil took detail out from the edges of the recess which created a stronger line. This effect was quite inspiring and I could see this being used in a piece of work where the focus is on negative spaces.
I did learn that the pencil I used (6B to start and moved to HB for the last three) and the type/thickness of paper have a direct impact to the outcome of the Forttage technique. For a few of these rubbings, the paper was too thick and/or the pencil to soft. I found that I got a better result on the wooden desk surface with the HB on this cartridge paper and so chose to use this for the stencil and magazine spines. I also realised that some materials will not produce a Frottage effect because the object was too soft and the texture compressed and so couldn’t be recorded like the more solid objects; see the photo above for the towel and the bubblewrap, neither of these came out as I expected and although disappointing, I understand that if there is compression, the texture will not sit proud against the paper for Frottage to be successful.
After carefully looking at the glass jar rubbing within this exercise, I have decided that it would be a really lovely experiment if I were to try this Frottage technique combined with the diluted ink (as attempted in the previous exercise above) to create a more developed piece. The photo of this exploration is below. Note that I have added a few strokes of HB graphite pencil marks around the screw top of the jar, around the middle ridge and base of the jar to give a little more detail; I knew that the pencil would blur a little when wiped with wet ink so wouldn’t be so obvious but still add a little detail, what I hadn’t expected was that it actually ‘muddied’ the ink which was a great outcome as I harnessed this to give a little shading to the right hand side and the thicker areas of glass around the screw top lid, the middle and base of the jar. What a great experience; I really enjoyed making this discovery after reflecting and experimenting further.

After a few days, I went back to this frottage technique and felt I could have a little fun with it; I envisaged the stencil work on a black school chalkboard. I also found a notebook in a draw and as I picked it up, I felt the texture of the spiral binding; I thought to myself “I could rub my pencil on this to get a great frottage technique!” This is really new to me and now I have explored and experienced this technique, I am finding ideas on how to use it in my drawings and ideas further than completing them in the exercises. This is really exciting to me; frottage has opened up a new avenue for me and developed my range of techniques as an artist.

What Next?
When reading back through my sketchbook, I’ve made a new note that asks me to look into texture further. What if texture wasn’t just described but also felt? What if the texture was made by using the material itself on top of the paper (rather than frottage where the texture is placed underneath) either by the marks the material leaves or by adhering the material to the paper itself; possibly dragging twine through ink to leave a mark, or sticking the twine onto the paper/foundation to work with further? I saw a tree made from string in my child’s school reception, children were stroking the ‘bark’ with their fingertips as they walked past. I will upload all research and reflection in the section of this blog entitled ‘Experimenting with Materials’; a documented journey with responses to ideas and thought process and of course, reflective notes on where I went further with these findings.















